Abstract Argumentation and Relational Programming

Report on Current Developments in Abstract Argumentation and Relational Programming

General Direction of the Field

The recent developments in the research area of abstract argumentation and relational programming indicate a significant shift towards enhancing the robustness, flexibility, and applicability of these frameworks. The field is moving towards more sophisticated semantic refinements and integration of advanced reasoning techniques, particularly in the context of non-monotonic logic and reactive programming.

In abstract argumentation, there is a growing emphasis on refining existing semantics by introducing new conditions that address the vacuity of extensions. This approach aims to provide more nuanced interpretations of argumentation frameworks, especially in scenarios where traditional semantics may fall short. The integration of principles from weak argumentation semantics and the analysis of undisputed semantics are key areas of focus, suggesting a move towards more principled and systematic approaches to argumentation theory.

In the realm of relational programming, particularly within the miniKanren ecosystem, there is a noticeable trend towards improving compatibility and extending the capabilities of existing systems. Researchers are focusing on enhancing backward compatibility with standard miniKanren programs, integrating new problem-solving paradigms such as integrity constraints, and exploring the application of relational programming in reactive web development. These efforts aim to broaden the applicability of relational programming to more complex and dynamic environments, such as web applications and combinatorial search problems.

Additionally, there is a strong emphasis on practical implementation and performance optimization. Papers discussing the implementation of specific relations (e.g., divisibility by three) and the development of relational solvers for type inference highlight the field's commitment to providing practical insights and tools for developers. This focus on practicality is complemented by theoretical advancements, such as the analysis of maximal consistent signatures, which contribute to a deeper understanding of reasoning with inconsistent information.

Noteworthy Developments

  • Vacuous Reduct Semantics for Abstract Argumentation: The systematic overview and principle-based analysis of vacuous reduct semantics represent a significant advancement in refining argumentation frameworks, offering a more nuanced approach to handling extensions.

  • Improving stableKanren's Backward Compatibility: The introduction of find-grinded contradiction handling and the run-partial interface significantly enhance the usability and compatibility of stableKanren with standard miniKanren programs.

  • Relational Reactive Programming for the Web: The integration of miniKanren into reactive web development frameworks opens up new possibilities for synchronized model-view evolution, marking a novel application of relational programming.

These developments collectively push the boundaries of abstract argumentation and relational programming, offering innovative solutions and broadening the scope of their applications.

Sources

Revisiting Vacuous Reduct Semantics for Abstract Argumentation (Extended Version)

Improving stableKanren's Backward Compatibility

Six Ways to Implement Divisibility by Three in miniKanren

To Be or Not To Be: Adding Integrity Constraints to stableKanren to Make a Decision

Relational Reactive Programming: miniKanren for the Web

A Relational Solver for Constraint-based Type Inference

Reasoning with maximal consistent signatures