Safe and Stable Control Systems

Current Developments in the Research Area of Safe and Stable Control Systems

The recent advancements in the field of safe and stable control systems have been particularly innovative, focusing on enhancing the robustness and performance of control algorithms under various constraints and uncertainties. The general direction of the field is moving towards the integration of probabilistic and optimization-based approaches, which aim to balance safety and performance in real-time control scenarios.

One of the key innovations is the development of novel control algorithms that do not rely on assumptions about the boundedness or Lipschitz continuity of the system dynamics. This is particularly significant for high-order, multi-input multi-output (MIMO) nonlinear systems with unknown dynamic terms. The introduction of Barrier Integral Control, which leverages the integration of reciprocal barrier functions and error-integral terms, has shown promise in ensuring global asymptotic stabilization while adhering to transient constraints. This approach decouples the system's trajectory and asymptotic performance from uncertain model parameters, control-gain selection, and initial conditions, making it highly adaptable to a wide range of systems.

Another notable trend is the cooptimization of safety and performance in autonomous systems. This is achieved by transforming safety state constraints into equivalent control constraints, thereby simplifying the solution of constrained optimal control problems. The resulting state and time-dependent control-constrained optimal control problem can be solved using dynamic programming principles, offering a robust framework for synthesizing controllers that consistently outperform traditional methods in both safety and performance metrics.

The field is also witnessing advancements in the understanding of how control barrier functions (CBFs) impact the dynamics of closed-loop systems. Recent research has demonstrated that the choice of CBF does not affect the number, location, or stability properties of equilibria within the safe set, except at the boundary. This insight is crucial for designing controllers that maintain system stability without introducing undesirable equilibrium points.

Probabilistic approaches to safety are gaining traction, particularly in scenarios with uncertain conditions. The integration of control barrier functions with scenario model predictive control (MPC) has led to the development of controllers that provide distribution-free, a priori guarantees on the system's expected safety violation frequency. This approach is particularly useful in applications like unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) collision avoidance, where probabilistic safety constraints are transformed into deterministic ones via scenario-based methodologies.

Lastly, the control of connected automated vehicles (CAVs) is being advanced through the application of control barrier functions to connected cruise control (CCC). This research highlights the importance of considering factors such as response lag and connection architecture in ensuring the safety and stability of CAVs. The synthesis of safety-critical CCC controllers that leverage information from connected vehicles to improve safety, even under lag conditions, is a significant step forward in the deployment of CAVs.

Noteworthy Papers

  • Barrier Integral Control for Global Asymptotic Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems under Smooth Feedback and Transient Constraints: Introduces a novel algorithm that ensures global asymptotic stabilization without relying on assumptions about the system dynamics, decoupling performance from uncertain model parameters.

  • Cooptimizing Safety and Performance with a Control-Constrained Formulation: Transforms safety state constraints into control constraints, enabling the synthesis of controllers that outperform traditional methods in both safety and performance.

  • Equilibria and Their Stability Do Not Depend on the Control Barrier Function in Safe Optimization-Based Control: Provides insights into how CBFs impact closed-loop system dynamics, showing that CBF choice does not affect equilibria within the safe set.

  • Probabilistically safe controllers based on control barrier functions and scenario model predictive control: Combines CBFs with scenario MPC to provide distribution-free safety guarantees, particularly useful in uncertain conditions.

  • Safe and Stable Connected Cruise Control for Connected Automated Vehicles with Response Lag: Applies CBF theory to CCC, highlighting the impact of response lag and connection architecture on CAV safety and stability.

Sources

Barrier Integral Control for Global Asymptotic Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems under Smooth Feedback and Transient Constraints

Cooptimizing Safety and Performance with a Control-Constrained Formulation

Equilibria and Their Stability Do Not Depend on the Control Barrier Function in Safe Optimization-Based Control

Probabilistically safe controllers based on control barrier functions and scenario model predictive control

Safe and Stable Connected Cruise Control for Connected Automated Vehicles with Response Lag

Disturbance-Robust Backup Control Barrier Functions: Safety Under Uncertain Dynamics